Whatever happens to the Ukraine peace plan, the US president has secured several key victories for himself

Recent events have confirmed that US President Donald Trump is the ultimate political pragmatist.

Since his inauguration in January, Trump has endured ongoing criticism from portions his MAGA base - due in large part to his failure to end the conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine. Trump won the presidency by promising to end these foreign conflicts, and his seeming inability to do so has alienated a segment of his core supporters.

Trump's most strident critic has been Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene - a former Trump acolyte, conspiracy theorist, and committed MAGA ideologue.

Greene recently broadened her attack to condemn Trump for his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and his refusal to release all documents held by the Department of Justice relating to its investigation of Epstein.

This is the domestic political context that caused Trump to intensify his attempts to finally resolve the conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine. For Trump - as for all American presidents - his domestic and foreign policy agendas are intimately interrelated.

Trump recently brokered a solution to the Gaza conflict that has resulted in a temporary peace - which is unlikely to satisfy either the Palestinians or the Netanyahu government, but is, however, acceptable to the Arab states in the Middle East, Russia, China, and the United Nations.

Trump's provisional settlement is one that the Biden administration could not have even contemplated. Biden, like previous Democrat presidents, was committed to uncritically supporting the Netanyahu government - no matter what atrocities it committed.

As for the Ukraine conflict, Trump has, since his reelection, consistently sought to end it - a reflection of his election promise that he would "end the conflict within 24 hours."

Trump's efforts to resolve the conflict have, until recently, proved ineffective - because of Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky's intransigence, and the determination of the UK, France, Germany, and the EU to support their ailing proxy and prolong the conflict indefinitely.

It now appears, however, that Trump may be on the verge of resolving the Ukraine conflict - which has needlessly wreaked havoc and death for the past three years.

Trump's latest attempt to end the conflict is based his 28-point peace plan announced last week. This resolution could not have been entertained by Biden - committed as he was to propping up the faltering Zelensky regime in order to conduct a proxy war with Russia.

How has Trump brought about these dramatic results? Essentially, by being the ultimate political pragmatist.

Trump's domestic agenda is illiberal and authoritarian - although, even here, his unexpected endorsement last week of the 'communist' mayor of New York, Zohran Mamdani (more below), reveals Trump's essential pragmatism.

Why has Trump been so determined to end the Ukraine conflict?

Not just because he is an isolationist and wants to defuse growing discontent within the Republican Party.  And not because he has any understanding of the complex historical relationship between Ukraine and Russia, or an appreciation of how the American-sponsored eastward expansion of NATO since the early 1990s provoked the conflict in the first place.

The answer is to be found in Trump's essential pragmatism and his instinctive belief that politics - both foreign and domestic - can be reduced to what he terms "the art of cutting a deal."

Trump's determination to end the Ukraine conflict has been opposed by influential figures within his own party - his administration contains many anti-Russia hawks and enthusiastic supporters of Ukraine. Keith Kellogg, Trump's special envoy to Ukraine, who announced his resignation this week, fell into this category. So, too, until recently, did Trump's secretary of state, Marco Rubio.

That is why Trump insisted that the negotiations relating to his 28-point peace plan be conducted by Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to Russia, rather than Kellogg or Rubio. Witkoff is not a diplomat or an ideologue - he is, like Trump, a wealthy property developer and a pragmatist.

This also explains why the European supporters of Ukraine continue to criticize Witkoff and seek to banish him from ongoing settlement negotiations.

Trump is likely to succeed in bringing about a resolution of the conflict in Ukraine because, on any realistic view, circumstances now compel a settlement. These circumstances include the following:

• Russia's comprehensive military success in Ukraine (approximately one-sixth of the country is currently under Russian control);
• the inability of Ukraine's depleted military forces to continue to prosecute the conflict;  
• the increasing political instability and unpopularity of the Zelensky regime (evidenced by resignations, the jailing of political opponents, and endless corruption scandals);
• the fact that Trump has made it clear to Zelensky that if a settlement is not reached, America will stop intelligence sharing and the supply of weapons to Ukraine;
• widespread and intensifying opposition to the conflict within those European nations that continue to fund it.

Trump's determination to end the conflict is based upon his pragmatic recognition of these circumstances.

Trump gave Zelensky a week to accept his plan, but agreement will not be reached within this timeframe. Given that the plan obliges Ukraine to cede large tracts of territory, reduce its military capability and give up any hope of joining NATO, further discussions between Trump and Zelensky - which began this week - will clearly be necessary if a settlement is to be achieved.

Zelensky has not rejected the plan outright, and told Vice President J.D. Vance last week that he respected Trump's determination to end the conflict.

And it appears that the UK, France, and Germany are now willing, for the first time, to seriously contemplate a settlement of some kind - although the ideologically-driven alternative settlement plan suggested by them this week has been rejected by Trump.

Interestingly, mainstream Western media organizations have recently modified their uniformly adulatory view of Zelensky. No longer is he portrayed as a saint-like figure and successful statesman. In fact, some media coverage of Zelensky now mirrors Trump's pragmatic assessment of him - as a failed leader who could have prevented the conflict, foolishly rejected a favorable early settlement offer, and is now obliged to accept very harsh peace terms.

Trump's peace plan has even been accepted without demur by some right-wing media outlets. The Australian Spectator, for example, endorsed the plan in an editorial last week - something utterly unimaginable even 12 months ago.

If anyone doubts that Trump is the ultimate pragmatist, his meeting at the White House last week with the recently elected New York city mayor, Zohran Mamdani, should dispel any illusions in that regard.

During Mamdani's campaign, Trump condemned him as a "100% communist lunatic" and "total nut job" and endorsed his opponent, former Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo. Trump also threatened to cut off federal funds to New York if Mamdani was elected mayor.

Thus when Trump invited Mamdani to the White House for a meeting last week, the mainstream media expected ideological fireworks.

Trump, however, welcomed Mamdami warmly and congratulated him on his victory, telling journalists: "I expect to be helping him, not hindering him." Trump, in fact, foreshadowed entering into a political partnership with Mamdani that "would make New York city great again." Trump also stunned journalists by saying, "some of his ideas are really the same ideas that I have."

Mamdani, being something of a pragmatist himself, and no doubt wishing to secure much needed federal funding for New York, graciously accepted Trump's glowing endorsement.

Trump, in fact, will find it much easier to work with the left-wing populist Mamdani than the current Democratic Party leadership. After all, the Democrat elites genuinely despise and fear Mamdani.

Trump endorsed Mamdani because the New York mayor is a winner - and Trump wants to achieve electoral success in New York in next year's mid-term elections. In the last presidential election, Trump polled very well in some working class districts of New York - attracting the votes of ordinary New Yorkers who refused to vote for the elitist Democratic Party.

This brings us back to Marjorie Taylor Greene and Trump's internal MAGA critics - all of whom are committed ideologues and unable to comprehend Trump's political pragmatism.

This is why Trump has been able to so easily disarm Greene and her attacks on him. Trump branded her as a "traitor" and pointed out - correctly - that she is simply "wacky." He then agreed to release all the Epstein documents - realizing that, no matter what they disclose, he will continue to maintain that the Epstein saga is a "Democrat hoax" and ignore the consequences.

Trump knows that the entire Epstein furore is nothing more that a particularly virulent strand of #MeToo hysteria - the wokest of all woke ideologies - that will not cause his rusted-on MAGA supporters to think less of him. Epstein hysteria may play well in the UK - and destroy tarnished celebrities like Prince Andrew - but Trump, as he has shown many times in the past, is immune to this type of criticism.

By announcing his 28-point peace plan and agreeing to release the Epstein documents in full, Trump has cleverly warded off any political threat that Greene and her supporters posed to him.

And as Trump was urging Zelensky to accept his 28-point peace plan and welcoming Mamdani to the White House last week, Greene announced that she was resigning from Congress and leaving politics altogether.

Thus, in little more than a week, Trump has initiated serious settlement discussions designed to finally resolve the conflict in Ukraine, ended the political career of his most vociferous internal MAGA critic, and brokered a political rapprochement with the 'communist' mayor of New York - all laudable and remarkable achievements that confirm that he is the ultimate political pragmatist.