US President Donald Trump publicly emphasized diplomacy with Iran following his February 11 meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. But experts say the deeper dispute may center not on Irans nuclear program, but on its expanding missile capabilities.

After the meeting, Trump signaled that negotiations with Tehran should continue. Netanyahu, however, has pushed for Irans missile program to be formally included in any agreement -- something Tehran has repeatedly rejected.

Speaking to RFE/RLs Radio Farda, US-based defense analyst Hossein Aryan argued that Israels long-term strategic objective extends beyond the nuclear issue.

If we look at this issue in a broad picture, Israels goal is to drastically reduce Irans defensive capabilities, both under the Islamic republic and even in the period after it, he said.

SEE ALSO:

Why Israel Now Eyes Iran's Missiles Over Nukes Ahead Of Netanyahu-Trump Talks

According to Aryan, Israel views Irans missile arsenal as its most significant military asset and its only deterrent capability.

While other regional states possess ballistic missiles, he said Israeli strategists see Irans program as fundamentally different because it has become increasingly indigenous and self-sustaining.

Israeli estimatessuggestthat, if left unchecked, Iran could expand its arsenal to as many as 8,000 missiles by 2028. Such projections help explain Israeli concerns about future saturation attacks overwhelming missile defense systems.

That is precisely why Netanyahus focus is not currently on the nuclear program, because they believe that part is under control or not presently at a critical stage; his main focus is on stopping Irans military and missile machine, Aryan said.

Irans nuclear program suffered a major setback after the United States joined Israels aerial campaign against Iran in June 2025, targeting nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz.

No Treaty Banning Missiles

The missile issue presents a major diplomatic obstacle. Tehran insists its conventional missile program is nonnegotiable, and Aryan noted that no binding international treaty has any outright prohibition on missile development.

Frameworks such as the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) and the Hague Code of Conduct are voluntary arrangements rather than enforceable bans.

SEE ALSO:

The Key Sticking Points To A US-Iran Deal Aimed At Averting War

At the same time, Aryan said US military movements near Iran suggest contingency planning if negotiations fail. He characterized the deployments as part deterrence, part pressure tactic.

Some of this is media shaping, and part of it is brinkmanship -- to push Iran toward diplomacy and extract maximum concessions, Aryan said. Still, he expressed doubt that such pressure would compel the Islamic republic to scale back or abandon its missile program.

'Deception Operation'

While Trump and Netanyahu share the goal of stopping a nuclear Iran, they differ on the breadth of a potential deal -- at least publicly. Wary of a narrow nuclear agreement, Netanyahu traveled to Washington specifically to ensure missiles are a nonnegotiable part of any US proposal.

Some analysts urge caution in interpreting Trumps public optimism for diplomacy.

In my view, Trumps statements do not necessarily indicate anything specific, and one cannot rely on them with certainty, said Mohammad Ghaedi, a lecturer at George Washington University.

He suggested that apparent differences between Washington and Israel over what constitutes an acceptable deal could be strategic messaging.

These remarks may reflect differences between the United States and Israel, but they could also be considered a deception operation, meaning he speaks of gaps and disagreements while simultaneously preparing for a surprise attack, Ghaedi said.

SEE ALSO:

'Robust' US Military Deployment To Gulf Ahead Of Possible Iran Strikes

Although the United States has bolstered its military presence in the region, Ghaedi assessed the likelihood of imminent strikes as relatively low.

Instead, he anticipates intensified sanctions and economic pressure. He pointed toremarksby US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where Bessent credited sanctions with weakening Irans economy and fueling domestic unrest.

Still, Ghaedi said Trump, potentially influenced by regional actors such as Qatar and Turkey, might accept a temporary arrangement, even if Netanyahu insists that any agreement must be permanent and include limits on Irans missile program.

Iran and the United States held talks earlier this month in Oman, and negotiations are expected to continue. But Tehran maintains that discussions can focus only on its nuclear program. On February 11, Ali Shamkhani, a senior adviser to Irans supreme leader, reiterated that the missile issue is not in the negotiators remit.

Mohammad Zarghami and Roya Maleki of RFE/RL's Radio Farda contributed to this report.

Will Iran Budge On Missile Program For A Deal?

Share

Share

• Copy link

• Facebook

• X (Twitter)

• LinkedIn

• Email

Share

Share

• Copy link

• Facebook

• X (Twitter)

• LinkedIn

• Email

Print